Demographics details for Dadeville, AL vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dadeville, AL vs Chickasha, OK.
Data | Dadeville | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,001 | 16,549 |
Median Age | 42.8 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $46,477 | $55,136 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Dadeville vs Chickasha
- The population in Chickasha is higher at 16,549, compared to 3,001 in Dadeville.
- Residents in Dadeville have a higher median age of 42.8 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136, compared to $46,477 in Dadeville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dadeville at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 14% in Dadeville.
- The unemployment rate in Dadeville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Dadeville vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Dadeville | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
Black | 35 | 6 |
White | 64 | 71 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Dadeville vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dadeville at 35% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chickasha at 71% compared to 64% in Dadeville.
- Both Dadeville and Chickasha have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Dadeville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 1% in Dadeville.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Dadeville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Dadeville | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.6% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.7% | 13.7% |
Depression | 23.9% | 25.4% |
Smoking | 26.5% | 21.8% |
Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 46.8% | 40.8% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dadeville vs Chickasha
- More residents in Dadeville report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 19.1% in Chickasha.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 23.9% in Dadeville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dadeville at 26.5% compared to 21.8% in Chickasha.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chickasha at 13.8% compared to 12.7% in Dadeville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dadeville at 46.8% compared to 40.8% in Chickasha.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Dadeville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Dadeville | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (32) | 0.5% (78) |
High School Diploma | 21.6% (647) | 22.5% (3,730) |
Less than High School | 31.9% (956) | 13.1% (2,160) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (279) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dadeville vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of residents in Dadeville have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 21.6% in Dadeville.
- More residents in Dadeville have less than a high school education at 31.9% compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 9.3% in Dadeville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.