Demographics details for Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Chowchilla, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Chowchilla, CA.

Data Cuyahoga falls Chowchilla
Population 50,655 18,738
Median Age 37.8 years 34.1 years
Median Income $67,922 $67,212
Married Families 41.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 7% 19%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 5.2

Population Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Chowchilla

  • In Cuyahoga falls, the population is higher at 50,655, compared to 18,738 in Chowchilla.
  • Residents in Cuyahoga falls have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 34.1 years in Chowchilla.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher median income of $67,922 compared to $67,212 in Chowchilla.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cuyahoga falls at 41.0% compared to 26.0% in Chowchilla.
  • The poverty level is higher in Chowchilla at 19%, compared to 7% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Chowchilla has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.8% in Cuyahoga falls.

Demographics

Demographics Cuyahoga falls vs Chowchilla provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cuyahoga falls Chowchilla
Black 5 6
White 81 29
Asian 6 6
Hispanic 3 48
Two or More Races 5 9
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Chowchilla

  • In Chowchilla, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 29% in Chowchilla.
  • Both Cuyahoga falls and Chowchilla have the same percentage of Asian residents at 6%.
  • Chowchilla has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chowchilla at 9%, compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • In Chowchilla, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Cuyahoga falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cuyahoga falls Chowchilla
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 20.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 15.1%
Depression 25.1% 23.3%
Smoking 18.5% 18.3%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 13.7%
Obesity 41.1% 36.7%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Chowchilla

  • In Chowchilla, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 17.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% compared to 23.3% in Chowchilla.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cuyahoga falls at 18.5% compared to 18.3% in Chowchilla.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cuyahoga falls at 18.8% compared to 13.7% in Chowchilla.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cuyahoga falls at 41.1% compared to 36.7% in Chowchilla.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cuyahoga falls at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cuyahoga falls Chowchilla
No Schooling 1.6% (825) 1.4% (271)
High School Diploma 19.4% (9,813) 14.6% (2,738)
Less than High School 6.3% (3,197) 31.2% (5,842)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.1% (13,215) 9.2% (1,731)

Education Levels Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Chowchilla

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.4% in Chowchilla.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 14.6% in Chowchilla.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chowchilla at 31.2%, compared to 6.3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 9.2% in Chowchilla.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.