Demographics details for Cut bank, MT vs Boaz, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cut bank, MT vs Boaz, AL.
| Data | Cut bank | Boaz |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,035 | 10,292 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $41,759 | $43,276 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cut bank vs Boaz
- The population in Boaz is higher at 10,292, compared to 3,035 in Cut bank.
- Residents in Cut bank have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 35.9 years in Boaz.
- Boaz has a higher median income of $43,276, compared to $41,759 in Cut bank.
- In Boaz, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Cut bank.
- Cut bank has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Boaz.
- The unemployment rate in Cut bank is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.5% in Boaz.
Demographics
Demographics Cut bank vs Boaz provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cut bank | Boaz |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 62 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | 26 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cut bank vs Boaz
- In Boaz, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Cut bank.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Boaz at 79% compared to 62% in Cut bank.
- Both Cut bank and Boaz have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Boaz has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 4% in Cut bank.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cut bank at 8% compared to 4% in Boaz.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cut bank at 26% compared to 0% in Boaz.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cut bank | Boaz |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 20.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 21.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.2% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cut bank vs Boaz
- In Boaz, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 18.5% in Cut bank.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Boaz at 25.8% versus 23.1% in Cut bank.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cut bank at 23.1% compared to 21.2% in Boaz.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cut bank at 22.2% compared to 15.2% in Boaz.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cut bank at 40.7% compared to 36.1% in Boaz.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cut bank at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Boaz.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cut bank | Boaz |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (37) |
| High School Diploma | 16.6% (503) | 18.1% (1,861) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (293) | 14.5% (1,489) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (360) | 9.9% (1,024) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cut bank vs Boaz
- In Boaz, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Cut bank.
- In Boaz, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 16.6% in Cut bank.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Boaz at 14.5%, compared to 9.7% in Cut bank.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cut bank hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 9.9% in Boaz.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.