Demographics details for Cumberland center, ME vs Norman, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cumberland center, ME vs Norman, OK.

Data Cumberland center Norman
Population 2,913 129,627
Median Age 37.9 years 31.0 years
Median Income $116,891 $62,849
Married Families 49.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 3% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.7 3.5

Population Comparison: Cumberland center vs Norman

  • The population in Norman is higher at 129,627, compared to 2,913 in Cumberland center.
  • Residents in Cumberland center have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 31.0 years in Norman.
  • Cumberland center has a higher median income of $116,891 compared to $62,849 in Norman.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cumberland center at 49.0% compared to 35.0% in Norman.
  • The poverty level is higher in Norman at 12%, compared to 3% in Cumberland center.
  • Norman has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.7% in Cumberland center.

Demographics

Demographics Cumberland center vs Norman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cumberland center Norman
Black Data is updating 5
White 90 67
Asian 1 5
Hispanic 5 8
Two or More Races 4 11
American Indian Data is updating 4

Demographics Comparison: Cumberland center vs Norman

  • In Norman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Cumberland center.
  • Cumberland center has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 67% in Norman.
  • In Norman, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Cumberland center.
  • Norman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Cumberland center.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Norman at 11%, compared to 4% in Cumberland center.
  • In Norman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Cumberland center.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cumberland center Norman
Mental Health Not Good 12.9% 17.0%
Physical Health Not Good 6.9% 11.2%
Depression 22.6% 25.6%
Smoking 9.0% 16.7%
Binge Drinking 21.3% 15.5%
Obesity 23.7% 34.9%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cumberland center vs Norman

  • In Norman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 12.9% in Cumberland center.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Norman at 25.6% versus 22.6% in Cumberland center.
  • Norman has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 9.0% in Cumberland center.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cumberland center at 21.3% compared to 15.5% in Norman.
  • Norman has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 23.7% in Cumberland center.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Norman at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Cumberland center.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cumberland center Norman
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (396)
High School Diploma 7.4% (217) 9.4% (12,171)
Less than High School 4.5% (130) 6.3% (8,174)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 41.6% (1,213) 26.3% (34,072)

Education Levels Comparison: Cumberland center vs Norman

  • In Norman, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Cumberland center.
  • In Norman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.4% compared to 7.4% in Cumberland center.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Norman at 6.3%, compared to 4.5% in Cumberland center.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cumberland center hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.6% compared to 26.3% in Norman.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.