Demographics details for Cudahy, WI vs Bradenton, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cudahy, WI vs Bradenton, FL.
Data | Cudahy | Bradenton |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,796 | 56,961 |
Median Age | 42.4 years | 45.4 years |
Median Income | $66,592 | $55,795 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Cudahy vs Bradenton
- The population in Bradenton is higher at 56,961, compared to 17,796 in Cudahy.
- The median age in Bradenton is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 42.4 years in Cudahy.
- Cudahy has a higher median income of $66,592 compared to $55,795 in Bradenton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cudahy at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in Bradenton.
- The poverty level is higher in Bradenton at 12%, compared to 11% in Cudahy.
- Bradenton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Cudahy.
Demographics
Demographics Cudahy vs Bradenton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cudahy | Bradenton |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 14 |
White | 77 | 54 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 9 | 22 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cudahy vs Bradenton
- In Bradenton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 3% in Cudahy.
- Cudahy has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 54% in Bradenton.
- Both Cudahy and Bradenton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Bradenton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 9% in Cudahy.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cudahy at 9% compared to 8% in Bradenton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cudahy and Bradenton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cudahy | Bradenton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 12.4% |
Depression | 24.3% | 20.1% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 21.5% |
Binge Drinking | 26.4% | 15.3% |
Obesity | 34.2% | 33.2% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cudahy vs Bradenton
- In Bradenton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.5% in Cudahy.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cudahy at 24.3% compared to 20.1% in Bradenton.
- Bradenton has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 16.4% in Cudahy.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 15.3% in Bradenton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cudahy at 34.2% compared to 33.2% in Bradenton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cudahy at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Bradenton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cudahy | Bradenton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (166) | 0.9% (506) |
High School Diploma | 25.1% (4,460) | 19.3% (10,990) |
Less than High School | 9.9% (1,768) | 15.2% (8,653) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (3,730) | 19.3% (10,990) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cudahy vs Bradenton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cudahy and Bradenton at 0.9%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 19.3% in Bradenton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bradenton at 15.2%, compared to 9.9% in Cudahy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 19.3% in Bradenton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.