Demographics details for Crystal lake, IL vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crystal lake, IL vs South jordan, UT.
| Data | Crystal lake | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,661 | 83,513 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $103,018 | $119,822 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Crystal lake vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 40,661 in Crystal lake.
- Residents in Crystal lake have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $103,018 in Crystal lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crystal lake at 46.0% compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
- The poverty level is identical in both Crystal lake and South jordan at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Crystal lake is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics Crystal lake vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crystal lake | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 79 | 83 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Crystal lake vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Crystal lake at 1% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South jordan at 83% compared to 79% in Crystal lake.
- Both Crystal lake and South jordan have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crystal lake at 11% compared to 7% in South jordan.
- Both Crystal lake and South jordan have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Crystal lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crystal lake | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 12.3% | 7.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 29.5% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crystal lake vs South jordan
- In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.0% in Crystal lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 19.6% in Crystal lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crystal lake at 12.3% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crystal lake at 18.9% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crystal lake at 29.5% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crystal lake at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crystal lake | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (95) | 0.2% (172) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (5,614) | 8.4% (6,995) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (2,362) | 2.7% (2,236) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (11,028) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crystal lake vs South jordan
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Crystal lake and South jordan at 0.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crystal lake hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Crystal lake have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Crystal lake and South jordan at 27.1%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.