Demographics details for Crosbyton, TX vs Warrensburg, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crosbyton, TX vs Warrensburg, MO.
Data | Crosbyton | Warrensburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,461 | 19,458 |
Median Age | 39.1 years | 24.4 years |
Median Income | $47,083 | $54,535 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 22% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Crosbyton vs Warrensburg
- The population in Warrensburg is higher at 19,458, compared to 1,461 in Crosbyton.
- Residents in Crosbyton have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 24.4 years in Warrensburg.
- Warrensburg has a higher median income of $54,535, compared to $47,083 in Crosbyton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crosbyton at 44.0% compared to 27.0% in Warrensburg.
- Crosbyton has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 14% in Warrensburg.
- Warrensburg has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Crosbyton.
Demographics
Demographics Crosbyton vs Warrensburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Crosbyton | Warrensburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 4 |
White | 6 | 80 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 75 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crosbyton vs Warrensburg
- In Warrensburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Crosbyton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Warrensburg at 80% compared to 6% in Crosbyton.
- In Warrensburg, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Crosbyton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crosbyton at 75% compared to 6% in Warrensburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Crosbyton at 16% compared to 7% in Warrensburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crosbyton and Warrensburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Crosbyton | Warrensburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 12.7% |
Depression | 23.6% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 20.5% | 20.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 42.7% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crosbyton vs Warrensburg
- More residents in Crosbyton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.4% in Warrensburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Warrensburg at 24.3% versus 23.6% in Crosbyton.
- Warrensburg has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 20.5% in Crosbyton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Warrensburg at 16.8% compared to 15.4% in Crosbyton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crosbyton at 42.7% compared to 37.2% in Warrensburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crosbyton at 26.0% compared to 11.0% in Warrensburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Crosbyton | Warrensburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (30) | 0.8% (150) |
High School Diploma | 24.6% (359) | 9.7% (1,895) |
Less than High School | 37.1% (542) | 6.0% (1,174) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (129) | 18.4% (3,573) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crosbyton vs Warrensburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Crosbyton have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Warrensburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crosbyton hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 9.7% in Warrensburg.
- More residents in Crosbyton have less than a high school education at 37.1% compared to 6.0% in Warrensburg.
- In Warrensburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 8.8% in Crosbyton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.