Demographics details for Cranston, RI vs Cudahy, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cranston, RI vs Cudahy, WI.
| Data | Cranston | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82,421 | 17,796 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $83,123 | $66,592 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cranston vs Cudahy
- In Cranston, the population is higher at 82,421, compared to 17,796 in Cudahy.
- The median age in Cudahy is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 39.9 years in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123 compared to $66,592 in Cudahy.
- In Cudahy, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Cranston.
- The poverty level is higher in Cudahy at 11%, compared to 8% in Cranston.
- The unemployment rate in Cranston is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Cudahy.
Demographics
Demographics Cranston vs Cudahy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cranston | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 3 |
| White | 61 | 77 |
| Asian | 7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cranston vs Cudahy
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cranston at 5% compared to 3% in Cudahy.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cudahy at 77% compared to 61% in Cranston.
- The Asian population is larger in Cranston at 7% compared to 2% in Cudahy.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cranston at 18% compared to 9% in Cudahy.
- Both Cranston and Cudahy have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cranston and Cudahy at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cranston | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 26.4% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cranston vs Cudahy
- In Cudahy, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cranston at 24.9% compared to 24.3% in Cudahy.
- Cudahy has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 18.6% in Cranston.
- Cudahy has higher obesity rates at 34.2% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cudahy at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cranston | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (930) | 0.9% (166) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,246) | 25.1% (4,460) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (11,048) | 9.9% (1,768) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (20,330) | 21.0% (3,730) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cranston vs Cudahy
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Cudahy.
- In Cudahy, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- More residents in Cranston have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 9.9% in Cudahy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 21.0% in Cudahy.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.