Demographics details for Cranfills gap, TX vs Antlers, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cranfills gap, TX vs Antlers, OK.
| Data | Cranfills gap | Antlers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 282 | 2,198 |
| Median Age | 42.6 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $58,125 | $27,798 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Cranfills gap vs Antlers
- The population in Antlers is higher at 2,198, compared to 282 in Cranfills gap.
- Residents in Cranfills gap have a higher median age of 42.6 years compared to 36.7 years in Antlers.
- Cranfills gap has a higher median income of $58,125 compared to $27,798 in Antlers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cranfills gap at 40.0% compared to 37.0% in Antlers.
- The poverty level is higher in Antlers at 18%, compared to 12% in Cranfills gap.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cranfills gap and Antlers at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Cranfills gap vs Antlers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cranfills gap | Antlers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 52 | 63 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 25 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 13 |
Demographics Comparison: Cranfills gap vs Antlers
- In Antlers, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Cranfills gap.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Antlers at 63% compared to 52% in Cranfills gap.
- Both Cranfills gap and Antlers have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cranfills gap at 20% compared to 5% in Antlers.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cranfills gap at 25% compared to 15% in Antlers.
- In Antlers, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Cranfills gap.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cranfills gap | Antlers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 26.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 36.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cranfills gap vs Antlers
- In Antlers, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.0% in Cranfills gap.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Antlers at 28.5% versus 23.4% in Cranfills gap.
- Antlers has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 14.7% in Cranfills gap.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cranfills gap at 20.8% compared to 14.1% in Antlers.
- Antlers has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 32.7% in Cranfills gap.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Antlers at 36.0% compared to 18.0% in Cranfills gap.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cranfills gap | Antlers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (23) |
| High School Diploma | 33.3% (94) | 23.4% (515) |
| Less than High School | 25.2% (71) | 26.2% (575) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.8% (22) | 10.7% (236) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cranfills gap vs Antlers
- In Antlers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Cranfills gap.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranfills gap hold a high school diploma at 33.3% compared to 23.4% in Antlers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Antlers at 26.2%, compared to 25.2% in Cranfills gap.
- In Antlers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.7% compared to 7.8% in Cranfills gap.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.