Demographics details for Cranberry lake, NY vs Texarkana, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cranberry lake, NY vs Texarkana, AR.

Data Cranberry lake Texarkana
Population 124 29,306
Median Age 67.6 years 39.1 years
Median Income $86,250 $45,233
Married Families 69.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 5% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.4

Population Comparison: Cranberry lake vs Texarkana

  • The population in Texarkana is higher at 29,306, compared to 124 in Cranberry lake.
  • Residents in Cranberry lake have a higher median age of 67.6 years compared to 39.1 years in Texarkana.
  • Cranberry lake has a higher median income of $86,250 compared to $45,233 in Texarkana.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cranberry lake at 69.0% compared to 30.0% in Texarkana.
  • The poverty level is higher in Texarkana at 15%, compared to 5% in Cranberry lake.
  • Texarkana has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 4.2% in Cranberry lake.

Demographics

Demographics Cranberry lake vs Texarkana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cranberry lake Texarkana
Black Data is updating 35
White 100 56
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 5
Two or More Races Data is updating 3
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Cranberry lake vs Texarkana

  • In Texarkana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 0% in Cranberry lake.
  • Cranberry lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 56% in Texarkana.
  • Both Cranberry lake and Texarkana have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Texarkana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Cranberry lake.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Texarkana at 3%, compared to 0% in Cranberry lake.
  • In Texarkana, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cranberry lake.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cranberry lake Texarkana
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 20.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 15.3%
Depression 24.7% 24.7%
Smoking 23.3% 24.4%
Binge Drinking 20.9% 14.0%
Obesity 39.5% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 31.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cranberry lake vs Texarkana

  • In Texarkana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 17.2% in Cranberry lake.
  • Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.7%.
  • Texarkana has a higher smoking rate at 24.4% compared to 23.3% in Cranberry lake.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cranberry lake at 20.9% compared to 14.0% in Texarkana.
  • Both cities have the same obesity rates at 39.5%.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cranberry lake at 31.0% compared to 18.0% in Texarkana.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cranberry lake Texarkana
No Schooling 3.2% (4) 1.5% (440)
High School Diploma 21.0% (26) 21.6% (6,319)
Less than High School 14.5% (18) 14.4% (4,229)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 45.2% (56) 11.1% (3,247)

Education Levels Comparison: Cranberry lake vs Texarkana

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cranberry lake have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.5% in Texarkana.
  • In Texarkana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 21.0% in Cranberry lake.
  • More residents in Cranberry lake have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 14.4% in Texarkana.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cranberry lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.2% compared to 11.1% in Texarkana.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.