Demographics details for Craigsville, WV vs Zanesville, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Craigsville, WV vs Zanesville, OH.

Data Craigsville Zanesville
Population 2,051 24,600
Median Age 55.4 years 38.1 years
Median Income $34,375 $40,927
Married Families 45.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 16% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 6.0

Population Comparison: Craigsville vs Zanesville

  • The population in Zanesville is higher at 24,600, compared to 2,051 in Craigsville.
  • Residents in Craigsville have a higher median age of 55.4 years compared to 38.1 years in Zanesville.
  • Zanesville has a higher median income of $40,927, compared to $34,375 in Craigsville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Craigsville at 45.0% compared to 25.0% in Zanesville.
  • Craigsville has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 11% in Zanesville.
  • Zanesville has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 4.2% in Craigsville.

Demographics

Demographics Craigsville vs Zanesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Craigsville Zanesville
Black Data is updating 9
White 94 79
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 1 3
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Craigsville vs Zanesville

  • In Zanesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Craigsville.
  • Craigsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 79% in Zanesville.
  • Both Craigsville and Zanesville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Zanesville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Craigsville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Zanesville at 8%, compared to 4% in Craigsville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Craigsville and Zanesville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Craigsville Zanesville
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% 20.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.8% 15.5%
Depression 28.7% 26.7%
Smoking 21.4% 25.8%
Binge Drinking 13.8% 16.6%
Obesity 43.0% 47.8%
Disability Percentage 30.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Craigsville vs Zanesville

  • In Zanesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 20.7% in Craigsville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Craigsville at 28.7% compared to 26.7% in Zanesville.
  • Zanesville has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 21.4% in Craigsville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Zanesville at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Craigsville.
  • Zanesville has higher obesity rates at 47.8% compared to 43.0% in Craigsville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Craigsville at 30.0% compared to 19.0% in Zanesville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Craigsville Zanesville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.6% (389)
High School Diploma 38.5% (789) 26.5% (6,510)
Less than High School 15.4% (316) 17.8% (4,373)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.0% (206) 9.0% (2,214)

Education Levels Comparison: Craigsville vs Zanesville

  • In Zanesville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Craigsville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Craigsville hold a high school diploma at 38.5% compared to 26.5% in Zanesville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Zanesville at 17.8%, compared to 15.4% in Craigsville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Craigsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Zanesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.