Demographics details for Cowgill, MO vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cowgill, MO vs Loves park, IL.
| Data | Cowgill | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 173 | 23,365 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $42,188 | $56,370 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Cowgill vs Loves park
- The population in Loves park is higher at 23,365, compared to 173 in Cowgill.
- Residents in Cowgill have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370, compared to $42,188 in Cowgill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cowgill at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- Cowgill has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- The unemployment rate in Cowgill is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Cowgill vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cowgill | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 7 |
| White | 87 | 71 |
| Asian | 4 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cowgill vs Loves park
- In Loves park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Cowgill.
- Cowgill has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- The Asian population is larger in Cowgill at 4% compared to 3% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 8% in Cowgill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 1% in Cowgill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cowgill and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cowgill | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cowgill vs Loves park
- More residents in Cowgill report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cowgill at 24.4% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cowgill at 22.6% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cowgill at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 39.2% in Cowgill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cowgill at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cowgill | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (3) | 0.4% (97) |
| High School Diploma | 42.8% (74) | 17.1% (3,994) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (23) | 9.7% (2,262) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (14) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cowgill vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Cowgill have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cowgill hold a high school diploma at 42.8% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
- More residents in Cowgill have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 8.1% in Cowgill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.