Demographics details for Coward, SC vs Palatine, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coward, SC vs Palatine, IL.
| Data | Coward | Palatine |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 744 | 65,485 |
| Median Age | 44.0 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $47,813 | $93,383 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Coward vs Palatine
- The population in Palatine is higher at 65,485, compared to 744 in Coward.
- Residents in Coward have a higher median age of 44.0 years compared to 39.4 years in Palatine.
- Palatine has a higher median income of $93,383, compared to $47,813 in Coward.
- In Palatine, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 28.0% in Coward.
- Coward has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 4% in Palatine.
- Palatine has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.9% in Coward.
Demographics
Demographics Coward vs Palatine provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coward | Palatine |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 5 |
| White | 84 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 13 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coward vs Palatine
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coward at 12% compared to 5% in Palatine.
- Coward has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 57% in Palatine.
- In Palatine, the Asian population stands at 13%, greater than 0% in Coward.
- Palatine has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 3% in Coward.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Palatine at 5%, compared to 1% in Coward.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Coward and Palatine at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coward | Palatine |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 22.2% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 26.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coward vs Palatine
- More residents in Coward report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 12.7% in Palatine.
- Depression is more prevalent in Coward at 23.6% compared to 17.0% in Palatine.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Coward at 22.2% compared to 11.3% in Palatine.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Palatine at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Coward.
- Obesity rates are higher in Coward at 37.5% compared to 26.8% in Palatine.
- Disability percentages are higher in Coward at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Palatine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coward | Palatine |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (9) | 1.7% (1,095) |
| High School Diploma | 22.0% (164) | 11.6% (7,584) |
| Less than High School | 17.1% (127) | 12.3% (8,071) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.5% (48) | 35.8% (23,474) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coward vs Palatine
- In Palatine, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.2% in Coward.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coward hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 11.6% in Palatine.
- More residents in Coward have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 12.3% in Palatine.
- In Palatine, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 6.5% in Coward.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.