Demographics details for Corsicana, TX vs Fort valley, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Corsicana, TX vs Fort valley, GA.

Data Corsicana Fort valley
Population 25,566 8,838
Median Age 34.6 years 30.6 years
Median Income $49,353 $31,807
Married Families 32.0% 18.0%
Poverty Level 14% 25%
Unemployment Rate 4.9 4.5

Population Comparison: Corsicana vs Fort valley

  • In Corsicana, the population is higher at 25,566, compared to 8,838 in Fort valley.
  • Residents in Corsicana have a higher median age of 34.6 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
  • Corsicana has a higher median income of $49,353 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Corsicana at 32.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 14% in Corsicana.
  • The unemployment rate in Corsicana is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.5% in Fort valley.

Demographics

Demographics Corsicana vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Corsicana Fort valley
Black 17 70
White 38 18
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 34 8
Two or More Races 10 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Corsicana vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 17% in Corsicana.
  • Corsicana has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Corsicana at 1% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Corsicana at 34% compared to 8% in Fort valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Corsicana at 10% compared to 4% in Fort valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Corsicana and Fort valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Corsicana Fort valley
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 15.5%
Depression 23.5% 19.5%
Smoking 19.9% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 11.8%
Obesity 40.1% 46.2%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Corsicana vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.7% in Corsicana.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Corsicana at 23.5% compared to 19.5% in Fort valley.
  • Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 19.9% in Corsicana.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Corsicana at 16.8% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
  • Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 40.1% in Corsicana.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Corsicana at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Fort valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Corsicana Fort valley
No Schooling 3.7% (957) 3.0% (267)
High School Diploma 14.2% (3,633) 13.9% (1,226)
Less than High School 25.3% (6,461) 17.3% (1,527)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.2% (2,357) 10.8% (954)

Education Levels Comparison: Corsicana vs Fort valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Corsicana have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 3.0% in Fort valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Corsicana hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
  • More residents in Corsicana have less than a high school education at 25.3% compared to 17.3% in Fort valley.
  • In Fort valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.8% compared to 9.2% in Corsicana.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.