Demographics details for Corpus christi, TX vs Tuscaloosa, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Corpus christi, TX vs Tuscaloosa, AL.

Data Corpus christi Tuscaloosa
Population 316,239 110,602
Median Age 35.7 years 28.8 years
Median Income $64,449 $47,257
Married Families 36.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 16% 21%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Corpus christi vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Corpus christi, the population is higher at 316,239, compared to 110,602 in Tuscaloosa.
  • Residents in Corpus christi have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 28.8 years in Tuscaloosa.
  • Corpus christi has a higher median income of $64,449 compared to $47,257 in Tuscaloosa.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Corpus christi at 36.0% compared to 26.0% in Tuscaloosa.
  • The poverty level is higher in Tuscaloosa at 21%, compared to 16% in Corpus christi.
  • The unemployment rate in Corpus christi is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in Tuscaloosa.

Demographics

Demographics Corpus christi vs Tuscaloosa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Corpus christi Tuscaloosa
Black 4 41
White 3 49
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 65 4
Two or More Races 26 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Corpus christi vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 4% in Corpus christi.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Tuscaloosa at 49% compared to 3% in Corpus christi.
  • In Tuscaloosa, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Corpus christi.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Corpus christi at 65% compared to 4% in Tuscaloosa.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Corpus christi at 26% compared to 3% in Tuscaloosa.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Corpus christi and Tuscaloosa at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Corpus christi Tuscaloosa
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 19.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 13.6%
Depression 22.2% 21.9%
Smoking 16.0% 19.6%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 14.4%
Obesity 40.4% 44.5%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Corpus christi vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.7% in Corpus christi.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Corpus christi at 22.2% compared to 21.9% in Tuscaloosa.
  • Tuscaloosa has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 16.0% in Corpus christi.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Corpus christi at 19.2% compared to 14.4% in Tuscaloosa.
  • Tuscaloosa has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 40.4% in Corpus christi.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Corpus christi at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Tuscaloosa.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Corpus christi Tuscaloosa
No Schooling 1.4% (4,372) 0.7% (721)
High School Diploma 15.5% (49,006) 12.5% (13,878)
Less than High School 19.4% (61,231) 6.1% (6,781)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.2% (47,964) 20.3% (22,425)

Education Levels Comparison: Corpus christi vs Tuscaloosa

  • A higher percentage of residents in Corpus christi have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Tuscaloosa.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Corpus christi hold a high school diploma at 15.5% compared to 12.5% in Tuscaloosa.
  • More residents in Corpus christi have less than a high school education at 19.4% compared to 6.1% in Tuscaloosa.
  • In Tuscaloosa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 15.2% in Corpus christi.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.