Demographics details for Corona, CA vs Brookhaven, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corona, CA vs Brookhaven, GA.
| Data | Corona | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 159,567 | 57,934 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $103,727 | $114,570 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Corona vs Brookhaven
- In Corona, the population is higher at 159,567, compared to 57,934 in Brookhaven.
- Residents in Corona have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 34.6 years in Brookhaven.
- Brookhaven has a higher median income of $114,570, compared to $103,727 in Corona.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Corona at 40.0% compared to 36.0% in Brookhaven.
- Corona has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 7% in Brookhaven.
- The unemployment rate in Corona is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.6% in Brookhaven.
Demographics
Demographics Corona vs Brookhaven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Corona | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 12 |
| White | 21 | 53 |
| Asian | 11 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 48 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Corona vs Brookhaven
- In Brookhaven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 6% in Corona.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brookhaven at 53% compared to 21% in Corona.
- The Asian population is larger in Corona at 11% compared to 7% in Brookhaven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Corona at 48% compared to 17% in Brookhaven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Corona at 13% compared to 9% in Brookhaven.
- In Brookhaven, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Corona.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Corona | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 16.6% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corona vs Brookhaven
- More residents in Corona report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 13.1% in Brookhaven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brookhaven at 17.8% versus 16.6% in Corona.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Corona at 11.8% compared to 10.0% in Brookhaven.
- Binge drinking is more common in Corona at 16.7% compared to 16.2% in Brookhaven.
- Obesity rates are higher in Corona at 34.1% compared to 27.2% in Brookhaven.
- Disability percentages are higher in Corona at 7.0% compared to 6.0% in Brookhaven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Corona | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (3,102) | 0.6% (341) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (22,788) | 5.1% (2,980) |
| Less than High School | 17.4% (27,748) | 8.0% (4,642) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (31,335) | 50.3% (29,125) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corona vs Brookhaven
- A higher percentage of residents in Corona have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.6% in Brookhaven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corona hold a high school diploma at 14.3% compared to 5.1% in Brookhaven.
- More residents in Corona have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 8.0% in Brookhaven.
- In Brookhaven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 19.6% in Corona.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.