Demographics details for Copperopolis, CA vs Bethlehem, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Copperopolis, CA vs Bethlehem, PA.

Data Copperopolis Bethlehem
Population 3,819 77,617
Median Age 43.7 years 35.9 years
Median Income $96,250 $62,072
Married Families 50.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 6% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Copperopolis vs Bethlehem

  • The population in Bethlehem is higher at 77,617, compared to 3,819 in Copperopolis.
  • Residents in Copperopolis have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 35.9 years in Bethlehem.
  • Copperopolis has a higher median income of $96,250 compared to $62,072 in Bethlehem.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Copperopolis at 50.0% compared to 29.0% in Bethlehem.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bethlehem at 13%, compared to 6% in Copperopolis.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Copperopolis and Bethlehem at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Copperopolis vs Bethlehem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Copperopolis Bethlehem
Black 3 9
White 54 47
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 25 30
Two or More Races 17 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Copperopolis vs Bethlehem

  • In Bethlehem, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Copperopolis.
  • Copperopolis has a higher percentage of White residents at 54% compared to 47% in Bethlehem.
  • In Bethlehem, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Copperopolis.
  • Bethlehem has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 25% in Copperopolis.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Copperopolis at 17% compared to 11% in Bethlehem.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Copperopolis and Bethlehem at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Copperopolis Bethlehem
Mental Health Not Good 17.0% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 12.1%
Depression 21.7% 21.8%
Smoking 13.6% 18.4%
Binge Drinking 18.6% 17.6%
Obesity 29.3% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Copperopolis vs Bethlehem

  • More residents in Copperopolis report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in Bethlehem.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bethlehem at 21.8% versus 21.7% in Copperopolis.
  • Bethlehem has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 13.6% in Copperopolis.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Copperopolis at 18.6% compared to 17.6% in Bethlehem.
  • Bethlehem has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 29.3% in Copperopolis.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Copperopolis at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Bethlehem.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Copperopolis Bethlehem
No Schooling 0.8% (31) 0.6% (452)
High School Diploma 16.8% (640) 16.9% (13,125)
Less than High School 16.4% (627) 12.9% (10,045)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.8% (528) 22.0% (17,044)

Education Levels Comparison: Copperopolis vs Bethlehem

  • A higher percentage of residents in Copperopolis have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Bethlehem.
  • In Bethlehem, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 16.8% in Copperopolis.
  • More residents in Copperopolis have less than a high school education at 16.4% compared to 12.9% in Bethlehem.
  • In Bethlehem, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 13.8% in Copperopolis.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.