Demographics details for Cook, NE vs Junction city, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cook, NE vs Junction city, KS.
Data | Cook | Junction city |
---|---|---|
Population | 318 | 22,264 |
Median Age | 34.3 years | 28.5 years |
Median Income | $62,500 | $60,709 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Cook vs Junction city
- The population in Junction city is higher at 22,264, compared to 318 in Cook.
- Residents in Cook have a higher median age of 34.3 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
- Cook has a higher median income of $62,500 compared to $60,709 in Junction city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cook at 52.0% compared to 40.0% in Junction city.
- The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 13%, compared to 6% in Cook.
- Junction city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 2.5% in Cook.
Demographics
Demographics Cook vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cook | Junction city |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 20 |
White | 91 | 43 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 5 | 18 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cook vs Junction city
- In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 3% in Cook.
- Cook has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 43% in Junction city.
- In Junction city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Cook.
- Junction city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 5% in Cook.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 0% in Cook.
- In Junction city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cook.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cook | Junction city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 11.0% |
Depression | 18.3% | 19.2% |
Smoking | 16.0% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 36.8% | 41.8% |
Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cook vs Junction city
- In Junction city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 13.8% in Cook.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Junction city at 19.2% versus 18.3% in Cook.
- Junction city has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 16.0% in Cook.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cook at 21.7% compared to 16.6% in Junction city.
- Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 36.8% in Cook.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cook at 28.0% compared to 16.0% in Junction city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cook | Junction city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (3) | 1.0% (216) |
High School Diploma | 27.0% (86) | 12.4% (2,755) |
Less than High School | 10.1% (32) | 6.9% (1,535) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (53) | 13.2% (2,941) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cook vs Junction city
- In Junction city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Cook.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cook hold a high school diploma at 27.0% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
- More residents in Cook have less than a high school education at 10.1% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cook hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 13.2% in Junction city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.