Demographics details for Colleyville, TX vs Alamo, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Colleyville, TX vs Alamo, TN.
| Data | Colleyville | Alamo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,850 | 2,317 |
| Median Age | 47.3 years | 34.9 years |
| Median Income | $196,298 | $50,135 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Colleyville vs Alamo
- In Colleyville, the population is higher at 25,850, compared to 2,317 in Alamo.
- Residents in Colleyville have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 34.9 years in Alamo.
- Colleyville has a higher median income of $196,298 compared to $50,135 in Alamo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Colleyville at 58.0% compared to 44.0% in Alamo.
- The poverty level is higher in Alamo at 14%, compared to 0% in Colleyville.
- Alamo has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Colleyville.
Demographics
Demographics Colleyville vs Alamo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Colleyville | Alamo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 9 |
| White | 72 | 54 |
| Asian | 8 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Colleyville vs Alamo
- In Alamo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 4% in Colleyville.
- Colleyville has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 54% in Alamo.
- The Asian population is larger in Colleyville at 8% compared to 1% in Alamo.
- Alamo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 8% in Colleyville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Alamo at 17%, compared to 8% in Colleyville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Colleyville and Alamo at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Colleyville | Alamo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 15.7% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 29.6% |
| Smoking | 8.7% | 25.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 27.3% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Colleyville vs Alamo
- In Alamo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 13.0% in Colleyville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Alamo at 29.6% versus 21.5% in Colleyville.
- Alamo has a higher smoking rate at 25.9% compared to 8.7% in Colleyville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Colleyville at 19.5% compared to 14.1% in Alamo.
- Alamo has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 27.3% in Colleyville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alamo at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in Colleyville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Colleyville | Alamo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (47) | 1.1% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 3.6% (936) | 24.9% (577) |
| Less than High School | 0.8% (208) | 26.1% (604) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 49.3% (12,744) | 7.9% (183) |
Education Levels Comparison: Colleyville vs Alamo
- In Alamo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Colleyville.
- In Alamo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 3.6% in Colleyville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Alamo at 26.1%, compared to 0.8% in Colleyville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Colleyville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.3% compared to 7.9% in Alamo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.