Demographics details for Coarsegold, CA vs Fort lupton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coarsegold, CA vs Fort lupton, CO.
| Data | Coarsegold | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,578 | 8,829 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $81,814 | $71,293 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Coarsegold vs Fort lupton
- The population in Fort lupton is higher at 8,829, compared to 4,578 in Coarsegold.
- Residents in Coarsegold have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
- Coarsegold has a higher median income of $81,814 compared to $71,293 in Fort lupton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Coarsegold at 47.0% compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort lupton at 10%, compared to 9% in Coarsegold.
- The unemployment rate in Coarsegold is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Fort lupton.
Demographics
Demographics Coarsegold vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coarsegold | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 26 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 14 | 53 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 20 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Coarsegold vs Fort lupton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coarsegold at 2% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- Coarsegold has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
- The Asian population is larger in Coarsegold at 1% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 14% in Coarsegold.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 8% in Coarsegold.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coarsegold at 2% compared to 1% in Fort lupton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coarsegold | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coarsegold vs Fort lupton
- More residents in Coarsegold report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Coarsegold at 21.0% compared to 19.9% in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 13.9% in Coarsegold.
- Binge drinking is more common in Coarsegold at 18.7% compared to 17.0% in Fort lupton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Coarsegold at 30.9% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Coarsegold at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coarsegold | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (15) | 1.6% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (742) | 16.2% (1,428) |
| Less than High School | 7.8% (356) | 28.0% (2,476) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (765) | 7.0% (622) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coarsegold vs Fort lupton
- In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Coarsegold.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 16.2%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 7.8% in Coarsegold.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coarsegold hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.