Demographics details for Coalinga, CA vs Scottsdale, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coalinga, CA vs Scottsdale, AZ.
| Data | Coalinga | Scottsdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,024 | 243,050 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 48.4 years |
| Median Income | $68,976 | $104,197 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Coalinga vs Scottsdale
- The population in Scottsdale is higher at 243,050, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- The median age in Scottsdale is higher at 48.4 years, compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Scottsdale has a higher median income of $104,197, compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- In Scottsdale, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Scottsdale.
- The unemployment rate in Coalinga is higher at 6.5%, compared to 2.9% in Scottsdale.
Demographics
Demographics Coalinga vs Scottsdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coalinga | Scottsdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 2 |
| White | 9 | 75 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 65 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 7 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Coalinga vs Scottsdale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coalinga at 4% compared to 2% in Scottsdale.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Scottsdale at 75% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Scottsdale, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Coalinga.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coalinga at 65% compared to 10% in Scottsdale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coalinga at 18% compared to 7% in Scottsdale.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coalinga at 2% compared to 1% in Scottsdale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coalinga | Scottsdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 16.4% | 19.1% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 10.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 26.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coalinga vs Scottsdale
- More residents in Coalinga report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.7% in Scottsdale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Scottsdale at 19.1% versus 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Coalinga at 17.2% compared to 10.2% in Scottsdale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Scottsdale at 19.3% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Obesity rates are higher in Coalinga at 39.1% compared to 26.5% in Scottsdale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Scottsdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coalinga | Scottsdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (537) | 0.5% (1,157) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (2,349) | 7.7% (18,770) |
| Less than High School | 39.2% (6,672) | 4.0% (9,724) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (1,380) | 47.7% (116,035) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coalinga vs Scottsdale
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.5% in Scottsdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 7.7% in Scottsdale.
- More residents in Coalinga have less than a high school education at 39.2% compared to 4.0% in Scottsdale.
- In Scottsdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.7% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.