Demographics details for Coal city, IL vs San jose, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coal city, IL vs San jose, CA.
| Data | Coal city | San jose |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,741 | 971,233 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $77,939 | $136,010 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Coal city vs San jose
- The population in San jose is higher at 971,233, compared to 5,741 in Coal city.
- Residents in Coal city have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 37.8 years in San jose.
- San jose has a higher median income of $136,010, compared to $77,939 in Coal city.
- In San jose, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 37.0% in Coal city.
- The poverty level is higher in San jose at 11%, compared to 8% in Coal city.
- San jose has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Coal city.
Demographics
Demographics Coal city vs San jose provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coal city | San jose |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 90 | 12 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 39 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Coal city vs San jose
- In San jose, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Coal city.
- Coal city has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 12% in San jose.
- In San jose, the Asian population stands at 39%, greater than 0% in Coal city.
- San jose has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 6% in Coal city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San jose at 13%, compared to 3% in Coal city.
- In San jose, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Coal city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coal city | San jose |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 14.7% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 8.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 20.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coal city vs San jose
- More residents in Coal city report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.1% in San jose.
- Depression is more prevalent in Coal city at 21.2% compared to 14.7% in San jose.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Coal city at 15.3% compared to 8.7% in San jose.
- Binge drinking is more common in Coal city at 19.5% compared to 13.8% in San jose.
- Obesity rates are higher in Coal city at 34.4% compared to 20.6% in San jose.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Coal city and San jose at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coal city | San jose |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (52) | 2.7% (26,673) |
| High School Diploma | 18.1% (1,037) | 10.3% (100,469) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (556) | 17.0% (165,241) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (884) | 33.0% (320,589) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coal city vs San jose
- In San jose, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.9% in Coal city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coal city hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 10.3% in San jose.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San jose at 17.0%, compared to 9.7% in Coal city.
- In San jose, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 15.4% in Coal city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.