Demographics details for Clinton, PA vs Fulton, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clinton, PA vs Fulton, MO.
| Data | Clinton | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,931 | 12,710 |
| Median Age | 39.8 years | 33.9 years |
| Median Income | $59,011 | $59,544 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Clinton vs Fulton
- In Clinton, the population is higher at 37,931, compared to 12,710 in Fulton.
- Residents in Clinton have a higher median age of 39.8 years compared to 33.9 years in Fulton.
- Fulton has a higher median income of $59,544, compared to $59,011 in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clinton at 41.0% compared to 29.0% in Fulton.
- The poverty level is higher in Fulton at 10%, compared to 9% in Clinton.
- Fulton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Clinton vs Fulton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clinton | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 9 |
| White | 94 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clinton vs Fulton
- In Fulton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 86% in Fulton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clinton at 1% compared to 0% in Fulton.
- Fulton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Clinton.
- Both Clinton and Fulton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clinton and Fulton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clinton | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 24.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clinton vs Fulton
- In Fulton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.0% in Clinton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clinton at 25.2% compared to 24.3% in Fulton.
- Fulton has a higher smoking rate at 24.7% compared to 21.8% in Clinton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clinton at 18.0% compared to 17.1% in Fulton.
- Fulton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 37.2% in Clinton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Fulton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clinton | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (160) | 0.0% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 27.7% (10,520) | 16.3% (2,077) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (5,136) | 16.9% (2,154) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (5,075) | 14.7% (1,867) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clinton vs Fulton
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Fulton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 16.3% in Fulton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fulton at 16.9%, compared to 13.5% in Clinton.
- In Fulton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.7% compared to 13.4% in Clinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.