Demographics details for Clifton, ID vs Dearborn, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clifton, ID vs Dearborn, MI.
| Data | Clifton | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 443 | 107,710 |
| Median Age | 22.8 years | 32.3 years |
| Median Income | $96,750 | $64,600 |
| Married Families | 71.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Clifton vs Dearborn
- The population in Dearborn is higher at 107,710, compared to 443 in Clifton.
- The median age in Dearborn is higher at 32.3 years, compared to 22.8 years in Clifton.
- Clifton has a higher median income of $96,750 compared to $64,600 in Dearborn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clifton at 71.0% compared to 38.0% in Dearborn.
- The poverty level is higher in Dearborn at 12%, compared to 10% in Clifton.
- Dearborn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Clifton.
Demographics
Demographics Clifton vs Dearborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clifton | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 83 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clifton vs Dearborn
- In Dearborn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Clifton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dearborn at 86% compared to 83% in Clifton.
- In Dearborn, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Clifton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clifton at 14% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dearborn at 5%, compared to 3% in Clifton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clifton and Dearborn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clifton | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 24.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clifton vs Dearborn
- In Dearborn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.9% in Clifton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Dearborn at 26.6% versus 23.6% in Clifton.
- Dearborn has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 17.9% in Clifton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dearborn at 17.6% compared to 16.1% in Clifton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clifton at 37.4% compared to 34.2% in Dearborn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clifton at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Dearborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clifton | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.8% (3,058) |
| High School Diploma | 33.4% (148) | 12.3% (13,249) |
| Less than High School | 0.9% (4) | 17.5% (18,849) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.5% (91) | 21.3% (22,938) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clifton vs Dearborn
- In Dearborn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Clifton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clifton hold a high school diploma at 33.4% compared to 12.3% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dearborn at 17.5%, compared to 0.9% in Clifton.
- In Dearborn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 20.5% in Clifton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.