Demographics details for Clifton hill, MO vs Gallatin, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clifton hill, MO vs Gallatin, TN.

Data Clifton hill Gallatin
Population 87 48,194
Median Age 28.3 years 37.8 years
Median Income $45,500 $68,548
Married Families 31.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 10% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.3

Population Comparison: Clifton hill vs Gallatin

  • The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
  • The median age in Gallatin is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
  • Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $45,500 in Clifton hill.
  • In Gallatin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 31.0% in Clifton hill.
  • The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 10% in Clifton hill.
  • The unemployment rate in Clifton hill is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.

Demographics

Demographics Clifton hill vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clifton hill Gallatin
Black Data is updating 15
White 94 67
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 9
Two or More Races 6 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Gallatin

  • In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
  • Clifton hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
  • In Gallatin, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Clifton hill.
  • Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 6% in Clifton hill.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clifton hill and Gallatin at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clifton hill Gallatin
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 14.3% 13.2%
Depression 25.9% 27.7%
Smoking 21.4% 20.8%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 14.7%
Obesity 41.6% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Gallatin

  • In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.9% in Clifton hill.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 25.9% in Clifton hill.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 21.4% compared to 20.8% in Gallatin.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Clifton hill at 16.0% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Clifton hill at 41.6% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clifton hill Gallatin
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.2% (596)
High School Diploma 26.4% (23) 13.9% (6,695)
Less than High School 13.8% (12) 11.6% (5,600)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 3.4% (3) 19.6% (9,464)

Education Levels Comparison: Clifton hill vs Gallatin

  • In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Clifton hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clifton hill hold a high school diploma at 26.4% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
  • More residents in Clifton hill have less than a high school education at 13.8% compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
  • In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.