Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Iowa city, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Iowa city, IA.
Data | Clayton | Iowa city |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,235 | 75,233 |
Median Age | 46.0 years | 26.0 years |
Median Income | $89,282 | $54,879 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.4 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Iowa city
- The population in Iowa city is higher at 75,233, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 26.0 years in Iowa city.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $54,879 in Iowa city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 47.0% compared to 29.0% in Iowa city.
- The poverty level is higher in Iowa city at 14%, compared to 10% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Clayton is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.4% in Iowa city.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Iowa city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clayton | Iowa city |
---|---|---|
Black | 30 | 8 |
White | 61 | 72 |
Asian | 2 | 8 |
Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Iowa city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 8% in Iowa city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Iowa city at 72% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- In Iowa city, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 2% in Clayton.
- Iowa city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Clayton.
- Both Clayton and Iowa city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Iowa city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clayton | Iowa city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 9.2% |
Depression | 24.4% | 19.6% |
Smoking | 15.3% | 15.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 20.4% |
Obesity | 37.4% | 33.9% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Iowa city
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.6% in Iowa city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 24.4% compared to 19.6% in Iowa city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 15.3% compared to 15.0% in Iowa city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Iowa city at 20.4% compared to 18.9% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 37.4% compared to 33.9% in Iowa city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Iowa city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clayton | Iowa city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 0.2% (164) |
High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 6.2% (4,655) |
Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 2.7% (2,064) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 30.8% (23,180) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Iowa city
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clayton and Iowa city at 0.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 6.2% in Iowa city.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 5.6% compared to 2.7% in Iowa city.
- In Iowa city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.8% compared to 26.3% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.