Demographics details for Clayton, NJ vs Ripley, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NJ vs Ripley, TN.
| Data | Clayton | Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,920 | 7,672 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $91,711 | $39,454 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Ripley
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 8,920, compared to 7,672 in Ripley.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 36.7 years in Ripley.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $91,711 compared to $39,454 in Ripley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 36.0% compared to 26.0% in Ripley.
- The poverty level is higher in Ripley at 18%, compared to 6% in Clayton.
- Ripley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Ripley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 58 |
| White | 65 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Ripley
- In Ripley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 20% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 37% in Ripley.
- Both Clayton and Ripley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 11% compared to 1% in Ripley.
- Both Clayton and Ripley have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Ripley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 23.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 17.9% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 30.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 11.9% |
| Obesity | 33.0% | 45.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Ripley
- In Ripley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 23.0% compared to 16.7% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ripley at 27.8% versus 22.2% in Clayton.
- Ripley has a higher smoking rate at 30.2% compared to 16.1% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.1% compared to 11.9% in Ripley.
- Ripley has higher obesity rates at 45.0% compared to 33.0% in Clayton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ripley at 25.0% compared to 17.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (15) | 1.1% (86) |
| High School Diploma | 22.9% (2,046) | 21.9% (1,679) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (1,044) | 15.3% (1,172) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.0% (1,246) | 8.2% (632) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Ripley
- In Ripley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 22.9% compared to 21.9% in Ripley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ripley at 15.3%, compared to 11.7% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.0% compared to 8.2% in Ripley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.