Demographics details for Clayton, NC vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NC vs Loves park, IL.
| Data | Clayton | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,445 | 23,365 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $71,698 | $56,370 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Loves park
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 29,445, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- The median age in Loves park is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698 compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Clayton and Loves park at 35.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Clayton is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 7 |
| White | 59 | 71 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 22% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Loves park at 71% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- In Loves park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 13% compared to 10% in Loves park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Loves park
- In Loves park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 23.1% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 39.9% compared to 39.4% in Loves park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (210) | 0.4% (97) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (3,700) | 17.1% (3,994) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (1,598) | 9.7% (2,262) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (5,471) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Loves park at 9.7%, compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.