Demographics details for Clayton, NC vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NC vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Clayton | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,445 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $71,698 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 29,445 in Clayton.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 33.6 years, compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698 compared to $71,367 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 3.7% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 21 |
| White | 59 | 10 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 22% compared to 21% in Lancaster.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Clayton.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 13% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 23.1% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 15.2% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 17.6% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 39.9% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Clayton and Lancaster at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (210) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (3,700) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (1,598) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (5,471) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.7% in Clayton.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.