Demographics details for Clayton, NC vs Green, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NC vs Green, OH.
| Data | Clayton | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,445 | 27,269 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $71,698 | $90,419 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Green
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 29,445, compared to 27,269 in Green.
- The median age in Green is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Green has a higher median income of $90,419, compared to $71,698 in Clayton.
- In Green, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 4% in Green.
- Green has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.7% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Green provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 1 |
| White | 59 | 94 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Green
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 22% compared to 1% in Green.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Green at 94% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- Both Clayton and Green have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 13% compared to 1% in Green.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 3% in Green.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Green at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Green
- In Green, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Green at 24.7% versus 23.1% in Clayton.
- Green has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Green at 19.1% compared to 17.6% in Clayton.
- Green has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 39.9% in Clayton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Green.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Green |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (210) | 0.2% (46) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (3,700) | 16.6% (4,514) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (1,598) | 3.0% (828) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (5,471) | 29.3% (7,977) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Green
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Green.
- In Green, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 5.4% compared to 3.0% in Green.
- In Green, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.3% compared to 18.6% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.