Demographics details for Clarksville, TN vs Fresno, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksville, TN vs Fresno, CA.
| Data | Clarksville | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 176,974 | 545,567 |
| Median Age | 30.1 years | 32.1 years |
| Median Income | $62,688 | $63,001 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 6.6 |
Population Comparison: Clarksville vs Fresno
- The population in Fresno is higher at 545,567, compared to 176,974 in Clarksville.
- The median age in Fresno is higher at 32.1 years, compared to 30.1 years in Clarksville.
- Fresno has a higher median income of $63,001, compared to $62,688 in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clarksville at 36.0% compared to 30.0% in Fresno.
- The poverty level is higher in Fresno at 20%, compared to 12% in Clarksville.
- Fresno has a higher unemployment rate at 6.6% compared to 4.3% in Clarksville.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksville vs Fresno provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksville | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 7 |
| White | 55 | 10 |
| Asian | 3 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksville vs Fresno
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksville at 22% compared to 7% in Fresno.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 10% in Fresno.
- In Fresno, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 3% in Clarksville.
- Fresno has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 11% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fresno at 18%, compared to 9% in Clarksville.
- In Fresno, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clarksville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksville | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksville vs Fresno
- More residents in Clarksville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.7% in Fresno.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarksville at 28.4% compared to 17.6% in Fresno.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksville at 20.1% compared to 15.5% in Fresno.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarksville at 14.8% compared to 13.7% in Fresno.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksville at 39.3% compared to 37.3% in Fresno.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Clarksville and Fresno at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksville | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (976) | 2.8% (15,183) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (24,180) | 11.6% (63,519) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (9,720) | 22.1% (120,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (29,557) | 14.9% (81,421) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksville vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.6% in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 11.6% in Fresno.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fresno at 22.1%, compared to 5.5% in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 14.9% in Fresno.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.