Demographics details for Clarksville, AR vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksville, AR vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Clarksville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,555 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $35,911 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Clarksville vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 9,555 in Clarksville.
- The median age in Gallatin is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 35.3 years in Clarksville.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- In Gallatin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 13% in Gallatin.
- The unemployment rate in Clarksville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksville vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 15 |
| White | 60 | 67 |
| Asian | 6 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksville vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 3% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallatin at 67% compared to 60% in Clarksville.
- The Asian population is larger in Clarksville at 6% compared to 2% in Gallatin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clarksville at 23% compared to 9% in Gallatin.
- Both Clarksville and Gallatin have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clarksville at 1% compared to 0% in Gallatin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 27.9% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 24.5% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksville vs Gallatin
- More residents in Clarksville report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 19.0% in Gallatin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarksville at 27.9% compared to 27.7% in Gallatin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksville at 24.5% compared to 20.8% in Gallatin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gallatin at 14.7% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksville at 39.7% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarksville at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.2% (402) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (2,064) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 28.6% (2,735) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (786) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksville vs Gallatin
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville have no formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 1.2% in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- More residents in Clarksville have less than a high school education at 28.6% compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.