Demographics details for Clarendon, TX vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarendon, TX vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Clarendon | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,948 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $47,457 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Clarendon vs Fairburn
- The population in Fairburn is higher at 16,956, compared to 1,948 in Clarendon.
- Residents in Clarendon have a higher median age of 33.7 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245, compared to $47,457 in Clarendon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clarendon at 25.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 10% in Clarendon.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Clarendon.
Demographics
Demographics Clarendon vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarendon | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 73 |
| White | 76 | 12 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarendon vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 11% in Clarendon.
- Clarendon has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Clarendon at 4% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 6% in Clarendon.
- Both Clarendon and Fairburn have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarendon and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarendon | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarendon vs Fairburn
- More residents in Clarendon report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarendon at 25.8% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarendon at 20.1% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarendon at 18.3% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarendon at 38.4% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarendon at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarendon | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (14) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 11.4% (222) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (342) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (142) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarendon vs Fairburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarendon have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Fairburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 11.4% in Clarendon.
- More residents in Clarendon have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- In Fairburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 7.3% in Clarendon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.