Demographics details for Claremont, CA vs Indian trail, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Claremont, CA vs Indian trail, NC.
Data | Claremont | Indian trail |
---|---|---|
Population | 36,001 | 41,724 |
Median Age | 41.5 years | 36.1 years |
Median Income | $115,091 | $95,101 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Claremont vs Indian trail
- The population in Indian trail is higher at 41,724, compared to 36,001 in Claremont.
- Residents in Claremont have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 36.1 years in Indian trail.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091 compared to $95,101 in Indian trail.
- In Indian trail, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 42.0% in Claremont.
- The poverty level is identical in both Claremont and Indian trail at 6%.
- The unemployment rate in Claremont is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.8% in Indian trail.
Demographics
Demographics Claremont vs Indian trail provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Claremont | Indian trail |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 9 |
White | 37 | 71 |
Asian | 16 | 3 |
Hispanic | 25 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Claremont vs Indian trail
- In Indian trail, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Indian trail at 71% compared to 37% in Claremont.
- The Asian population is larger in Claremont at 16% compared to 3% in Indian trail.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Claremont at 25% compared to 11% in Indian trail.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Claremont at 16% compared to 6% in Indian trail.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Claremont and Indian trail at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Claremont | Indian trail |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 14.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 9.3% |
Depression | 16.3% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 8.2% | 13.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 24.5% | 31.2% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Claremont vs Indian trail
- In Indian trail, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Indian trail at 22.0% versus 16.3% in Claremont.
- Indian trail has a higher smoking rate at 13.5% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Indian trail at 18.5% compared to 16.7% in Claremont.
- Indian trail has higher obesity rates at 31.2% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Claremont at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Indian trail.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Claremont | Indian trail |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (403) | 0.7% (287) |
High School Diploma | 6.7% (2,427) | 12.8% (5,353) |
Less than High School | 6.2% (2,248) | 6.6% (2,761) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.5% (14,204) | 24.4% (10,201) |
Education Levels Comparison: Claremont vs Indian trail
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Indian trail.
- In Indian trail, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.8% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Indian trail at 6.6%, compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 24.4% in Indian trail.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.