Demographics details for Claremont, CA vs Clarksdale, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Claremont, CA vs Clarksdale, MS.
| Data | Claremont | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,001 | 13,969 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $115,091 | $35,377 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 27% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Claremont vs Clarksdale
- In Claremont, the population is higher at 36,001, compared to 13,969 in Clarksdale.
- Residents in Claremont have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 35.4 years in Clarksdale.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091 compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Claremont at 42.0% compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksdale at 27%, compared to 6% in Claremont.
- Clarksdale has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 5.4% in Claremont.
Demographics
Demographics Claremont vs Clarksdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Claremont | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 86 |
| White | 37 | 9 |
| Asian | 16 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Claremont vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher percentage of White residents at 37% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- The Asian population is larger in Claremont at 16% compared to 0% in Clarksdale.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Claremont at 25% compared to 2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Claremont at 16% compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Claremont and Clarksdale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Claremont | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 8.2% | 25.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 11.1% |
| Obesity | 24.5% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Claremont vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksdale at 20.8% versus 16.3% in Claremont.
- Clarksdale has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Claremont at 16.7% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksdale at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Claremont | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (403) | 2.0% (274) |
| High School Diploma | 6.7% (2,427) | 9.2% (1,281) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (2,248) | 15.2% (2,130) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.5% (14,204) | 14.1% (1,964) |
Education Levels Comparison: Claremont vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.1% in Claremont.
- In Clarksdale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.2% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksdale at 15.2%, compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 14.1% in Clarksdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.