Demographics details for Chowchilla, CA vs Lexington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chowchilla, CA vs Lexington, NC.
| Data | Chowchilla | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,738 | 19,679 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $67,212 | $36,868 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Chowchilla vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 19,679, compared to 18,738 in Chowchilla.
- The median age in Lexington is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 34.1 years in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher median income of $67,212 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 26.0% in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 15% in Lexington.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Chowchilla and Lexington at 5.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Chowchilla vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chowchilla | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 31 |
| White | 29 | 38 |
| Asian | 6 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 48 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 6% in Chowchilla.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lexington at 38% compared to 29% in Chowchilla.
- The Asian population is larger in Chowchilla at 6% compared to 4% in Lexington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chowchilla at 48% compared to 16% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 9% in Chowchilla.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chowchilla at 2% compared to 0% in Lexington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chowchilla | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Lexington
- More residents in Chowchilla report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 19.2% in Lexington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 25.0% versus 23.3% in Chowchilla.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 18.3% in Chowchilla.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lexington at 13.8% compared to 13.7% in Chowchilla.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 36.7% in Chowchilla.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chowchilla | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (271) | 2.7% (531) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (2,738) | 17.0% (3,355) |
| Less than High School | 31.2% (5,842) | 25.6% (5,036) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,731) | 10.2% (2,009) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chowchilla vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.4% in Chowchilla.
- In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 14.6% in Chowchilla.
- More residents in Chowchilla have less than a high school education at 31.2% compared to 25.6% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.2% compared to 9.2% in Chowchilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.