Demographics details for Choudrant, LA vs Harlingen, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Choudrant, LA vs Harlingen, TX.
| Data | Choudrant | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,005 | 71,678 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $69,313 | $50,367 |
| Married Families | 72.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Choudrant vs Harlingen
- The population in Harlingen is higher at 71,678, compared to 1,005 in Choudrant.
- Residents in Choudrant have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 33.2 years in Harlingen.
- Choudrant has a higher median income of $69,313 compared to $50,367 in Harlingen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Choudrant at 72.0% compared to 32.0% in Harlingen.
- The poverty level is higher in Harlingen at 18%, compared to 10% in Choudrant.
- Harlingen has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.5% in Choudrant.
Demographics
Demographics Choudrant vs Harlingen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Choudrant | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 75 | -5 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 83 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Choudrant vs Harlingen
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Choudrant and Harlingen at 2%.
- Choudrant has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to -5% in Harlingen.
- The Asian population is larger in Choudrant at 4% compared to 1% in Harlingen.
- Harlingen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 83%, compared to 7% in Choudrant.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harlingen at 19%, compared to 12% in Choudrant.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Choudrant and Harlingen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Choudrant | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Choudrant vs Harlingen
- In Harlingen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.7% in Choudrant.
- Depression is more prevalent in Choudrant at 27.0% compared to 20.1% in Harlingen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Choudrant at 18.0% compared to 16.7% in Harlingen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Choudrant at 19.6% compared to 16.3% in Harlingen.
- Harlingen has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 36.7% in Choudrant.
- Disability percentages are higher in Choudrant at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Harlingen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Choudrant | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.1% (1,536) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (153) | 13.6% (9,737) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (54) | 26.2% (18,783) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 40.1% (403) | 12.8% (9,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Choudrant vs Harlingen
- In Harlingen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Choudrant.
- A higher percentage of residents in Choudrant hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 13.6% in Harlingen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harlingen at 26.2%, compared to 5.4% in Choudrant.
- A higher percentage of residents in Choudrant hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.1% compared to 12.8% in Harlingen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.