Demographics details for Choudrant, LA vs Bardstown, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Choudrant, LA vs Bardstown, KY.
| Data | Choudrant | Bardstown |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,005 | 13,739 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $69,313 | $47,654 |
| Married Families | 72.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Choudrant vs Bardstown
- The population in Bardstown is higher at 13,739, compared to 1,005 in Choudrant.
- The median age in Bardstown is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 37.1 years in Choudrant.
- Choudrant has a higher median income of $69,313 compared to $47,654 in Bardstown.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Choudrant at 72.0% compared to 36.0% in Bardstown.
- The poverty level is higher in Bardstown at 12%, compared to 10% in Choudrant.
- Bardstown has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Choudrant.
Demographics
Demographics Choudrant vs Bardstown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Choudrant | Bardstown |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 13 |
| White | 75 | 77 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Choudrant vs Bardstown
- In Bardstown, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 2% in Choudrant.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bardstown at 77% compared to 75% in Choudrant.
- The Asian population is larger in Choudrant at 4% compared to 1% in Bardstown.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Choudrant at 7% compared to 5% in Bardstown.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Choudrant at 12% compared to 4% in Bardstown.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Choudrant and Bardstown at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Choudrant | Bardstown |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 37.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Choudrant vs Bardstown
- In Bardstown, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.7% in Choudrant.
- Depression is more prevalent in Choudrant at 27.0% compared to 26.6% in Bardstown.
- Bardstown has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 18.0% in Choudrant.
- Binge drinking is more common in Choudrant at 19.6% compared to 15.7% in Bardstown.
- Bardstown has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 36.7% in Choudrant.
- Disability percentages are higher in Choudrant at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Bardstown.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Choudrant | Bardstown |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.3% (181) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (153) | 17.7% (2,438) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (54) | 14.7% (2,021) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 40.1% (403) | 15.9% (2,186) |
Education Levels Comparison: Choudrant vs Bardstown
- In Bardstown, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Choudrant.
- In Bardstown, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 15.2% in Choudrant.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bardstown at 14.7%, compared to 5.4% in Choudrant.
- A higher percentage of residents in Choudrant hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.1% compared to 15.9% in Bardstown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.