Demographics details for Chittenden, VT vs Garland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chittenden, VT vs Garland, TX.
| Data | Chittenden | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 169,301 | 240,854 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $89,494 | $71,044 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 1.9 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Chittenden vs Garland
- The population in Garland is higher at 240,854, compared to 169,301 in Chittenden.
- Residents in Chittenden have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 34.4 years in Garland.
- Chittenden has a higher median income of $89,494 compared to $71,044 in Garland.
- In Garland, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 38.0% in Chittenden.
- The poverty level is higher in Garland at 12%, compared to 8% in Chittenden.
- Garland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 1.9% in Chittenden.
Demographics
Demographics Chittenden vs Garland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chittenden | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 16 |
| White | 85 | 6 |
| Asian | 4 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 45 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chittenden vs Garland
- In Garland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 3% in Chittenden.
- Chittenden has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 6% in Garland.
- In Garland, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 4% in Chittenden.
- Garland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 3% in Chittenden.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garland at 21%, compared to 5% in Chittenden.
- In Garland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Chittenden.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chittenden | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 26.8% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | 33.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chittenden vs Garland
- In Garland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.2% in Chittenden.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chittenden at 26.8% compared to 22.2% in Garland.
- Garland has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 11.9% in Chittenden.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chittenden at 20.3% compared to 17.6% in Garland.
- Garland has higher obesity rates at 33.9% compared to 27.2% in Chittenden.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chittenden at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Garland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chittenden | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (854) | 2.5% (6,080) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (16,873) | 13.9% (33,524) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (9,127) | 24.7% (59,406) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.9% (62,540) | 15.5% (37,249) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chittenden vs Garland
- In Garland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.5% in Chittenden.
- In Garland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 10.0% in Chittenden.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garland at 24.7%, compared to 5.4% in Chittenden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chittenden hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.9% compared to 15.5% in Garland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.