Demographics details for Chicago, IL vs Grand junction, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chicago, IL vs Grand junction, CO.
| Data | Chicago | Grand junction |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,665,039 | 68,034 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $71,673 | $62,993 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Chicago vs Grand junction
- In Chicago, the population is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 68,034 in Grand junction.
- The median age in Grand junction is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher median income of $71,673 compared to $62,993 in Grand junction.
- In Grand junction, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Grand junction.
- The unemployment rate in Chicago is higher at 7.1%, compared to 4.7% in Grand junction.
Demographics
Demographics Chicago vs Grand junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chicago | Grand junction |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 1 |
| White | 23 | 73 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chicago vs Grand junction
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chicago at 29% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand junction at 73% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- The Asian population is larger in Chicago at 7% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chicago at 30% compared to 16% in Grand junction.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chicago at 10% compared to 8% in Grand junction.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chicago and Grand junction at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chicago | Grand junction |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 29.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chicago vs Grand junction
- In Grand junction, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.5% in Chicago.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grand junction at 24.5% versus 16.3% in Chicago.
- Grand junction has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 15.1% in Chicago.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 16.5% in Chicago.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chicago at 34.1% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Chicago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chicago | Grand junction |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (44,697) | 0.4% (245) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (354,780) | 13.9% (9,476) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (419,784) | 9.7% (6,605) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (811,024) | 23.8% (16,201) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chicago vs Grand junction
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Grand junction.
- In Grand junction, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 13.3% in Chicago.
- More residents in Chicago have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 23.8% in Grand junction.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.