Demographics details for Chewelah, WA vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chewelah, WA vs Trumann, AR.
| Data | Chewelah | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,570 | 7,305 |
| Median Age | 49.0 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $52,905 | $37,618 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Chewelah vs Trumann
- The population in Trumann is higher at 7,305, compared to 2,570 in Chewelah.
- Residents in Chewelah have a higher median age of 49.0 years compared to 40.0 years in Trumann.
- Chewelah has a higher median income of $52,905 compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chewelah at 39.0% compared to 35.0% in Trumann.
- The poverty level is higher in Trumann at 13%, compared to 10% in Chewelah.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Chewelah and Trumann at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Chewelah vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chewelah | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 90 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chewelah vs Trumann
- In Trumann, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Chewelah.
- Chewelah has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 84% in Trumann.
- Both Chewelah and Trumann have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chewelah at 4% compared to 3% in Trumann.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Trumann at 8%, compared to 5% in Chewelah.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chewelah at 1% compared to 0% in Trumann.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chewelah | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 29.5% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 44.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chewelah vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 20.0% in Chewelah.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chewelah at 29.5% compared to 28.5% in Trumann.
- Trumann has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 19.7% in Chewelah.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chewelah at 15.6% compared to 14.4% in Trumann.
- Trumann has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 33.7% in Chewelah.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 22.0% in Chewelah.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chewelah | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (10) | 1.8% (135) |
| High School Diploma | 20.3% (522) | 25.9% (1,895) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (316) | 24.4% (1,780) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (373) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chewelah vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.4% in Chewelah.
- In Trumann, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 20.3% in Chewelah.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Trumann at 24.4%, compared to 12.3% in Chewelah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chewelah hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.