Demographics details for Chesterhill, OH vs Starke, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesterhill, OH vs Starke, FL.
| Data | Chesterhill | Starke |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 270 | 5,864 |
| Median Age | 32.8 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $51,667 | $42,976 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Chesterhill vs Starke
- The population in Starke is higher at 5,864, compared to 270 in Chesterhill.
- The median age in Starke is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 32.8 years in Chesterhill.
- Chesterhill has a higher median income of $51,667 compared to $42,976 in Starke.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chesterhill at 38.0% compared to 25.0% in Starke.
- The poverty level is higher in Starke at 15%, compared to 10% in Chesterhill.
- The unemployment rate in Chesterhill is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.7% in Starke.
Demographics
Demographics Chesterhill vs Starke provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesterhill | Starke |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 26 |
| White | 43 | 66 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 29 | 7 |
| American Indian | 5 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chesterhill vs Starke
- In Starke, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 26% compared to 23% in Chesterhill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Starke at 66% compared to 43% in Chesterhill.
- In Starke, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Chesterhill.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Chesterhill and Starke at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chesterhill at 29% compared to 7% in Starke.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chesterhill at 5% compared to 0% in Starke.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesterhill | Starke |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.8% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.7% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 30.1% | 26.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 48.2% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesterhill vs Starke
- More residents in Chesterhill report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 19.3% in Starke.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chesterhill at 27.2% compared to 21.0% in Starke.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chesterhill at 30.1% compared to 26.7% in Starke.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chesterhill at 15.9% compared to 14.7% in Starke.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chesterhill at 48.2% compared to 38.8% in Starke.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chesterhill at 30.0% compared to 17.0% in Starke.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesterhill | Starke |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 24.1% (65) | 21.8% (1,278) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (28) | 12.6% (740) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.6% (26) | 8.1% (475) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesterhill vs Starke
- In Starke, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Chesterhill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesterhill hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 21.8% in Starke.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Starke at 12.6%, compared to 10.4% in Chesterhill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesterhill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.6% compared to 8.1% in Starke.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.