Demographics details for Chepachet, RI vs Yuma, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chepachet, RI vs Yuma, AZ.
Data | Chepachet | Yuma |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,755 | 98,527 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 32.0 years |
Median Income | $92,228 | $59,312 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 9.0 |
Population Comparison: Chepachet vs Yuma
- The population in Yuma is higher at 98,527, compared to 1,755 in Chepachet.
- Residents in Chepachet have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 32.0 years in Yuma.
- Chepachet has a higher median income of $92,228 compared to $59,312 in Yuma.
- In Yuma, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 33.0% in Chepachet.
- The poverty level is higher in Yuma at 18%, compared to 5% in Chepachet.
- Yuma has a higher unemployment rate at 9.0% compared to 4.3% in Chepachet.
Demographics
Demographics Chepachet vs Yuma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chepachet | Yuma |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 96 | 13 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 61 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 21 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chepachet vs Yuma
- In Yuma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Chepachet.
- Chepachet has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 13% in Yuma.
- Both Chepachet and Yuma have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Yuma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 61%, compared to 1% in Chepachet.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yuma at 21%, compared to 1% in Chepachet.
- In Yuma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Chepachet.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chepachet | Yuma |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 13.2% |
Depression | 25.9% | 19.3% |
Smoking | 12.5% | 16.2% |
Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 28.5% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chepachet vs Yuma
- In Yuma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.8% in Chepachet.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chepachet at 25.9% compared to 19.3% in Yuma.
- Yuma has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 12.5% in Chepachet.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chepachet at 20.3% compared to 17.6% in Yuma.
- Yuma has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 28.5% in Chepachet.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Yuma at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Chepachet.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chepachet | Yuma |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (5) | 1.7% (1,642) |
High School Diploma | 17.2% (302) | 13.2% (13,054) |
Less than High School | 9.6% (168) | 19.8% (19,520) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (411) | 12.3% (12,116) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chepachet vs Yuma
- In Yuma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.3% in Chepachet.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chepachet hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 13.2% in Yuma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yuma at 19.8%, compared to 9.6% in Chepachet.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chepachet hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 12.3% in Yuma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.