Demographics details for Chaska, MN vs Richardson, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chaska, MN vs Richardson, TX.
| Data | Chaska | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,262 | 118,802 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $99,988 | $94,362 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Chaska vs Richardson
- The population in Richardson is higher at 118,802, compared to 28,262 in Chaska.
- Residents in Chaska have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 34.5 years in Richardson.
- Chaska has a higher median income of $99,988 compared to $94,362 in Richardson.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Chaska and Richardson at 41.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Richardson at 6%, compared to 5% in Chaska.
- Richardson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.7% in Chaska.
Demographics
Demographics Chaska vs Richardson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chaska | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 12 |
| White | 80 | 49 |
| Asian | 3 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chaska vs Richardson
- In Richardson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 2% in Chaska.
- Chaska has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 49% in Richardson.
- In Richardson, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 3% in Chaska.
- Richardson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 8% in Chaska.
- Both Chaska and Richardson have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chaska and Richardson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chaska | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 12.9% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 32.2% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chaska vs Richardson
- In Richardson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 13.2% in Chaska.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richardson at 20.9% versus 20.6% in Chaska.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chaska at 12.9% compared to 11.8% in Richardson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chaska at 20.3% compared to 18.3% in Richardson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chaska at 32.2% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richardson at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Chaska.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chaska | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (659) | 1.4% (1,646) |
| High School Diploma | 11.0% (3,099) | 6.8% (8,041) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (2,283) | 8.4% (10,002) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.3% (7,986) | 36.7% (43,584) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chaska vs Richardson
- A higher percentage of residents in Chaska have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.4% in Richardson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chaska hold a high school diploma at 11.0% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richardson at 8.4%, compared to 8.1% in Chaska.
- In Richardson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 28.3% in Chaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.