Demographics details for Chandlerville, IL vs Wilmington, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chandlerville, IL vs Wilmington, NC.

Data Chandlerville Wilmington
Population 514 120,324
Median Age 44.8 years 37.6 years
Median Income $42,031 $58,908
Married Families 38.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.7

Population Comparison: Chandlerville vs Wilmington

  • The population in Wilmington is higher at 120,324, compared to 514 in Chandlerville.
  • Residents in Chandlerville have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 37.6 years in Wilmington.
  • Wilmington has a higher median income of $58,908, compared to $42,031 in Chandlerville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandlerville at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Wilmington.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Chandlerville and Wilmington at 12%.
  • Wilmington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.2% in Chandlerville.

Demographics

Demographics Chandlerville vs Wilmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chandlerville Wilmington
Black Data is updating 16
White 96 71
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 7
Two or More Races 3 5
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Wilmington

  • In Wilmington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
  • Chandlerville has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 71% in Wilmington.
  • In Wilmington, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Chandlerville.
  • Wilmington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wilmington at 5%, compared to 3% in Chandlerville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandlerville at 1% compared to 0% in Wilmington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chandlerville Wilmington
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 11.0%
Depression 22.9% 25.0%
Smoking 18.3% 16.5%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 18.5%
Obesity 35.6% 33.2%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Wilmington

  • Poor mental health levels are equal in both Chandlerville and Wilmington at 16.9%.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Wilmington at 25.0% versus 22.9% in Chandlerville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Chandlerville at 18.3% compared to 16.5% in Wilmington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wilmington at 18.5% compared to 17.8% in Chandlerville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Chandlerville at 35.6% compared to 33.2% in Wilmington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Chandlerville at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Wilmington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chandlerville Wilmington
No Schooling 1.0% (5) 0.5% (560)
High School Diploma 30.9% (159) 10.5% (12,679)
Less than High School 41.2% (212) 7.1% (8,513)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 4.1% (21) 28.5% (34,319)

Education Levels Comparison: Chandlerville vs Wilmington

  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Wilmington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville hold a high school diploma at 30.9% compared to 10.5% in Wilmington.
  • More residents in Chandlerville have less than a high school education at 41.2% compared to 7.1% in Wilmington.
  • In Wilmington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 4.1% in Chandlerville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.