Demographics details for Chandler, TX vs Azusa, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, TX vs Azusa, CA.
| Data | Chandler | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,476 | 48,824 |
| Median Age | 50.0 years | 32.8 years |
| Median Income | $53,814 | $81,516 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Azusa
- The population in Azusa is higher at 48,824, compared to 3,476 in Chandler.
- Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 50.0 years compared to 32.8 years in Azusa.
- Azusa has a higher median income of $81,516, compared to $53,814 in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 45.0% compared to 32.0% in Azusa.
- The poverty level is identical in both Chandler and Azusa at 12%.
- Azusa has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 4.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Azusa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 3 |
| White | 86 | -6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 16 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 66 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Azusa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 5% compared to 3% in Azusa.
- Chandler has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to -6% in Azusa.
- In Azusa, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 0% in Chandler.
- Azusa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 66%, compared to 8% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Azusa at 20%, compared to 1% in Chandler.
- In Azusa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Chandler.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 15.9% |
| Smoking | 19.0% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 30.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Azusa
- More residents in Chandler report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.6% in Azusa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chandler at 25.5% compared to 15.9% in Azusa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chandler at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Azusa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 18.8% compared to 15.1% in Azusa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 35.7% compared to 30.3% in Azusa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Azusa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (38) | 2.5% (1,200) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (656) | 14.2% (6,920) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (144) | 25.2% (12,281) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (528) | 17.2% (8,417) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Azusa
- In Azusa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.1% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in Azusa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Azusa at 25.2%, compared to 4.1% in Chandler.
- In Azusa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 15.2% in Chandler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.