Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Junction city, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Junction city, KS.
| Data | Chandler | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,895 | 22,264 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 28.5 years |
| Median Income | $48,168 | $60,709 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Junction city
- The population in Junction city is higher at 22,264, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
- Junction city has a higher median income of $60,709, compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- In Junction city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in Chandler.
- The poverty level is identical in both Chandler and Junction city at 13%.
- Junction city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 20 |
| White | 72 | 43 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 15 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Junction city
- In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 9% in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 43% in Junction city.
- In Junction city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Chandler.
- Junction city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 13% in Chandler.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 1% in Junction city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Junction city
- More residents in Chandler report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.1% in Junction city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chandler at 24.6% compared to 19.2% in Junction city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chandler at 20.3% compared to 18.5% in Junction city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Junction city at 16.6% compared to 14.6% in Chandler.
- Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 41.1% in Chandler.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Junction city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (216) |
| High School Diploma | 23.9% (691) | 12.4% (2,755) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (372) | 6.9% (1,535) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (469) | 13.2% (2,941) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Junction city
- In Junction city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
- More residents in Chandler have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 13.2% in Junction city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.