Demographics details for Chalfont, PA vs Portsmouth, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chalfont, PA vs Portsmouth, NH.
Data | Chalfont | Portsmouth |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,283 | 22,713 |
Median Age | 41.7 years | 42.1 years |
Median Income | $118,871 | $100,169 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 2% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 2.1 |
Population Comparison: Chalfont vs Portsmouth
- The population in Portsmouth is higher at 22,713, compared to 4,283 in Chalfont.
- The median age in Portsmouth is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 41.7 years in Chalfont.
- Chalfont has a higher median income of $118,871 compared to $100,169 in Portsmouth.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Chalfont and Portsmouth at 40.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Portsmouth at 5%, compared to 2% in Chalfont.
- The unemployment rate in Chalfont is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.1% in Portsmouth.
Demographics
Demographics Chalfont vs Portsmouth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chalfont | Portsmouth |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 88 | 89 |
Asian | 4 | 4 |
Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chalfont vs Portsmouth
- In Portsmouth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Portsmouth at 89% compared to 88% in Chalfont.
- Both Chalfont and Portsmouth have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chalfont at 4% compared to 2% in Portsmouth.
- Both Chalfont and Portsmouth have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chalfont and Portsmouth at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chalfont | Portsmouth |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 14.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 8.1% |
Depression | 22.1% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 12.6% | 11.5% |
Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 27.6% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chalfont vs Portsmouth
- In Portsmouth, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.0% compared to 13.8% in Chalfont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Portsmouth at 22.8% versus 22.1% in Chalfont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chalfont at 12.6% compared to 11.5% in Portsmouth.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chalfont at 20.5% compared to 18.5% in Portsmouth.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chalfont at 29.5% compared to 27.6% in Portsmouth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Portsmouth at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Chalfont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chalfont | Portsmouth |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (65) |
High School Diploma | 11.2% (479) | 10.8% (2,450) |
Less than High School | 2.3% (98) | 4.0% (898) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.7% (1,830) | 47.4% (10,777) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chalfont vs Portsmouth
- In Portsmouth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Chalfont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chalfont hold a high school diploma at 11.2% compared to 10.8% in Portsmouth.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Portsmouth at 4.0%, compared to 2.3% in Chalfont.
- In Portsmouth, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.4% compared to 42.7% in Chalfont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.