Demographics details for Centreville, MI vs Central city, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Centreville, MI vs Central city, KY.

Data Centreville Central city
Population 1,321 5,810
Median Age 45.6 years 33.5 years
Median Income $63,393 $52,184
Married Families 34.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 10% 16%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Centreville vs Central city

  • The population in Central city is higher at 5,810, compared to 1,321 in Centreville.
  • Residents in Centreville have a higher median age of 45.6 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
  • Centreville has a higher median income of $63,393 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
  • In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Centreville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 10% in Centreville.
  • The unemployment rate in Centreville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Central city.

Demographics

Demographics Centreville vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Centreville Central city
Black 4 3
White 92 88
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 2
Two or More Races 3 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Centreville vs Central city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Centreville at 4% compared to 3% in Central city.
  • Centreville has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 88% in Central city.
  • Both Centreville and Central city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Central city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Centreville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central city at 6%, compared to 3% in Centreville.
  • In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Centreville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Centreville Central city
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 15.5%
Depression 25.1% 26.8%
Smoking 20.1% 24.8%
Binge Drinking 18.5% 14.8%
Obesity 37.1% 41.9%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Centreville vs Central city

  • In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.8% in Centreville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 25.1% in Centreville.
  • Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 20.1% in Centreville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Centreville at 18.5% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
  • Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 37.1% in Centreville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Centreville at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Centreville Central city
No Schooling 0.7% (9) 1.1% (65)
High School Diploma 21.8% (288) 15.4% (897)
Less than High School 14.5% (192) 15.6% (905)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.1% (146) 8.3% (480)

Education Levels Comparison: Centreville vs Central city

  • In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Centreville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Centreville hold a high school diploma at 21.8% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 14.5% in Centreville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Centreville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 8.3% in Central city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.