Demographics details for Central city, NE vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central city, NE vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Central city | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,078 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $54,063 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Central city vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 3,078 in Central city.
- Residents in Central city have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $54,063 in Central city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central city at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Fontana.
- The poverty level is higher in Fontana at 13%, compared to 9% in Central city.
- Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Central city vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central city | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 8 |
| White | 86 | 2 |
| Asian | 3 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Central city vs Fontana
- In Fontana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Central city.
- Central city has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Central city.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 7% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 4% in Central city.
- In Fontana, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Central city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central city | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 18.6% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 14.5% in Central city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central city at 18.6% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central city at 17.5% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central city at 20.0% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Central city at 44.9% compared to 38.6% in Fontana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central city at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central city | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 23.4% (721) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (178) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (404) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central city hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 16.3% in Fontana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 5.8% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.